Are Non-Compete Agreements Enforceable?

Beth Dean 09.24.23
2023-10-24 Nextep blog - Non-compete agreements

The Answer Depends on Your State…For Now

As we reported in January, non-compete agreements preventing employees from working for competitors are becoming increasingly unenforceable. The FTC is currently working on banning them at a federal level, but unless and until that decision comes, non-competes are enforced at a state (and sometimes even local) level. 

As a reminder, when state and federal law differs, the one to use must be the one that benefits the employee the most.

Remember that to be enforceable, non-compete agreements must be in writing and signed by both the employer and the employee. Non-compete agreements can also be challenged in court. If a prospective, current, or former employee believes that a non-compete agreement is unreasonable or unenforceable, they can file a lawsuit to potentially declare the agreement void.

Here’s a rundown of where we currently stand on non-compete agreements, by state:

Note: This list is current as of October 24, 2023. State and local laws are subject to change at any time. Be sure to verify with your local authority or attorney when making decisions for your company.

  • Alabama: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration.
  • Alaska: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Arizona: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee is a high-level executive or manager.
  • Arkansas: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee is a high-level executive or manager.
  • California: Non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable, except in very limited circumstances.
  • Colorado: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration.
  • Connecticut: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Delaware: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee is a high-level executive or manager.
  • Florida: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Georgia: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee is a high-level executive or manager.
  • Hawaii: Non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable, except in very limited circumstances.
  • Idaho: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Illinois: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee is a high-level executive or manager.
  • Indiana: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Iowa: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee is a high-level executive or manager.
  • Kansas: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Kentucky: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee is a high-level executive or manager.
  • Louisiana: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Maine: Non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable, except in very limited circumstances.
  • Maryland: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Massachusetts: Non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable, except in very limited circumstances.
  • Michigan: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Minnesota: Non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable, except in very limited circumstances.
  • Mississippi: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee is a high-level executive or manager.
  • Missouri: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Montana: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Nebraska: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee is a high-level executive or manager.
  • Nevada: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • New Hampshire: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • New Jersey: Non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable, except in very limited circumstances.
  • New Mexico: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • New York: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration,
  • North Carolina: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee is a high-level executive or manager.
  • North Dakota: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Ohio: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Oklahoma: Non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable.
  • Oregon: Non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable, except in very limited circumstances.
  • Pennsylvania: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Rhode Island: Non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable, except in very limited circumstances.
  • South Carolina: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee is a high-level executive or manager.
  • South Dakota: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Tennessee: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Texas: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Utah: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Vermont: Non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable, except in very limited circumstances.
  • Virginia: Non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable, except in very limited circumstances.
  • Washington: Non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable, except in very limited circumstances.
  • West Virginia: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.
  • Wisconsin: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee is a high-level executive or manager.
  • Wyoming: Non-compete agreements are enforceable if they are reasonable in their scope and duration, and if the employee receives something of value in exchange for signing the agreement.

Please note that this is not an exhaustive list, and the laws in each state may change at any time. It is always best to consult with an attorney or your HR Business Partner at Nextep to understand the specific laws in your state.

Disclaimer: This is not to be construed as legal advice. If in question, please consult with your attorney.


Related Reading

Nextep - Man with phone

Read more about the FTC’s efforts to ban non-compete agreements on the national level.


 

Also on Nextep

Ah, the holiday season—a time for joy, festivities, and the age-old puzzle of compensating your employees. Let’s demystify the rules of holiday pay for both our hourly (nonexempt) and salaried (exempt) workers. For the Hourly Heroes Picture your business decked out in holiday cheer, but your nonexempt employees are sipping cocoa at home. Under the […]
Read more
Keep Your Party Pants Professional As the year ends, and you’ve achieved feats at work that deserve a standing ovation, the holiday office party is your well-earned, much-awaited reward.  But beware! When the festive spirit meets the allure of a bottomless drink supply, things can take a wild turn, leaving you nursing a hangover, regret, […]
Read more
We’ve talked recently about the importance of sustainability in business. Let’s take it a step further and look at ESG, or Environmental, Social, and Governance.  The Impact of ESG on Companies Environmental (E) Companies that focus on their environmental impact are making a positive change. They reduce their carbon footprint, use clean energy, and find […]
Read more
Sustainable business isn’t just for hippies! As we discussed in our previous article, sustainability is increasingly important to today’s business. It is a crucial and relevant issue that affects everyone and every organization, regardless of industry or beliefs. Sustainability involves taking a long-term, holistic view of how we interact with the environment and our communities, […]
Read more
At Nextep, we aim to stay informed about CEO concerns in order to better help with problem-solving. We were surprised to learn that sustainability has become a top concern. The statistics bring CEO concerns to light: A Gartner survey found that CEO concern about sustainability has increased 292% from their 2021-22 survey. In a survey […]
Read more
It’s not the most savory of topics, but still merits discussion. All of your employees will need to use the bathroom during work. Here’s a potty primer, if you will. Disability and Bathrooms The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) has clear regulations on bathroom accessibility in the workplace. Much of the guidance revolves around making […]
Read more
We’ve reported at length about preventing discrimination in the workplace. But let’s take a step back now and brush up on Title VII, the sweeping regulation that started it all.  Title VII of the Civil Rights Act forbids discrimination in any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, layoff, training, fringe benefits, […]
Read more
Illinois to Join in on Pay Transparency As we recently reported, pay transparency laws are gaining momentum across the United States. Now, they have another state to add to the roster.  Illinois recently passed an amendment to the Illinois Equal Pay Act that will require employers to show pay and benefits information when posting a […]
Read more
Time to check your handbook again for NLRB compliance The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has been busy shaping employee handbooks and workplace policies. With the recent Stericycle Inc. decision, the NLRB has introduced a new legal standard for evaluating employer work rules under Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).  Understanding the […]
Read more
Spoiler Alert: Yes We frequently see a question posed to HR pros: “Do I have to pay my employee if…?” We’ll go ahead and give you a major hint at the outset. In many of the scenarios we see, the answer is yes, you do have to pay your employee. Here are a few scenarios. […]
Read more
When hiring workers, knowing whether they’re employees or independent contractors is essential. The difference between the two can significantly impact your business, including your tax liability, your liability for workers’ compensation claims, the worker’s rights and benefits, and your ability to control how your workers do their jobs. Read all about it here, and check […]
Read more
Employers Must Now Prove “Substantial Increased Cost” to Deny Religious Accommodation Recently, the Supreme Court ruled that employers must now demonstrate a substantially increased cost to deny an employee’s request for a religious accommodation.  This ruling, which comes in the case of Groff v. DeJoy, clarifies the standard for “undue hardship” under Title VII of […]
Read more

Download Our App